Page 100 - TINA Dergi Sayi 09
P. 100

TINA


             Denizcilik Arkeolojisi Dergisi



                                                                                                     Fig. 6





























              The site contains at least three shipwrecks. The oth-  Rivers. The seabed is usually covered with a deposit
             er site is known as Mavi Kent Papaz limanı (pastor’s  layer along all shores of the plain Cilicia. Therefore, it
             port).  previous  surveys  in  this  site  revealed  a  ship-  is not easy to detect archaeological remains which have
             wreck. We explored the site, and registered the previ-  been lying buried under the sandfloor.
             ously unknown artefacts.                           Districts of Yenişehir, Akdeniz, and Tarsus: We
              Kaş: The shoreline of Kaş District has been previ-  conducted two scans in parallel to the coastline in these
             ously  surveyed,  yielding  many  shipwrecks,  anchors  districts. The scanning width covered two corridors of
             and artefacts. The coasts of this district is renown as  2x50 meters. No archaeological feature has been de-
             a busy maritime spot for thousands of years because  tected  here  due  to  the  above  mentioned  reason.  Any
             of many islands and natural harbour formations in the  potential archaeological remains should have been cov-
             vicinity.  Archaealogical  treasures  from  different  pe-  ered with a layer of deposits.
             riods have been detected again during the 2017 cam-  Karaduvar County of Tarsus: To the west of the
             paign (Fig. 5). presence of still unexplored islands and  Akgübre sewage plant, we identified presence of an an-
             coastline indicate likelihood of discovering more ship-  cient port which has already been filled (Fig. 6). This
             wrecks in the future.                            ancient port seems to have lost its in-situ form due to
             SurVeYS On tHe merSİn SHOreLIne                  both  modern  facilities  in  the  site  and  infrastructure
              Mezitli District: We conducted sonar scanning in the  work. The port is situated on the mouth of a river bed.
             shores deeper than three meters by the Selçuk 1 training  The surface material on the land with a rich archaeo-
                                                                                                    th
                                                                                           rd
             ship, and in shallower areas by boats. The examination  logical content are dated to the 3  BC to 5  AD cen-
             on the cape and vicinity of the stream to the west of  turies.  The County of Karaduvar houses an harbour
             the Soli pompeipolis port, which reflected forms on the  anchored by large fishing boats in Mersin. We gathered
             sonar equipment didn’t provide any archaeological fea-  information about potential underwater remains along
             ture. The Mersin Bay has been silted up by several small  the Mersin shoreline during interviews made with the
             creeks as well as alluvials from the Seyhan and Ceyhan  fishermen here.

















              98
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105