Page 35 - TINA Dergi Sayi 12
P. 35

TINA


                                                                         Maritime Archaeology Periodical

               That means that during this period (around 4,000-  od at a depth of 7 m below today’s surface (present sea
            3,000 years ago) the relative sea level was several   level) indicating that the site was occupied until Troy VI
            meters lower than today. It appears that the sea level   (Fig. 3) . Other classical examples include the ancient
                                                                    25
            was still 2 to 3 meters lower than today 3000 years ago,   cities and harbors of Miletus and Priene .
                                                                                               26
            while it was still rising during the colonization of peo-  During the past 3,000 years, there have been minor
            ple who migrated from Greece and Aegean islands to   climatic  fluctuations.  The  Roman  Warm  Climate  and
            the Anatolian coasts.                             subsequent Little Ice Age are among the most remark-
              The Archaic, Hellenistic, and Roman periods corre-  able ones (Fig. 4) . Nevertheless, no concrete data is
                                                                             27
            spond to the last phase of the final rise to the present lev-  available indicating their impact on sea level changes.
            el (Fig. 4). Coastal structures from these periods are also   On the other hand, it is known that all of the ancient
            located 1 to 2 m below sea level in many places, either   settlements in the Aegean have experienced devastating
            before or behind the shore. The main reason why those   earthquakes from time to time since western Anatolia is
            coastal structures, primarily harbors, became unusable   an active tectonic region. However, there is also no data
            and are now typically located inland far from present   showing that delta development has been influenced by
            shore (e.g. Miletus, Priene, Ephesus), is not associated   tectonic movements during the past 3,000 years, due to
            only with sea level change, but rather the ongoing ad-  the much slower course of such movements compared to
            vance of the delta due to alluvial deposits (Fig. 8) .   climatic changes. Consequently, alluvial deposits appear
                                                      22
              In conclusion, there has been no encroachment by the   to have been the main factor effective in shaping low
            sea towards the land despite a slight rise in sea level   coastal zones during this recent period. Theoretically it
            during the past 3,000 years, because the amount of allu-  can be assumed that climatic and tectonic factors were
            vial deposits has compensated for the rise of the sea and   also involved in a way in this process. However, it may
            continued to fill up the shore. Thus, the shoreline has   be  misleading  to  distinguish  these  minor  effects  on  a
            continued to advance seaward. In addition to the natural   delta shore, which is a quite dynamic area of sedimenta-
            erosion which makes up the alluvial deposits, increased   tion, or to extrapolate these effects. For now, it is more
            human-made erosion may have been a factor in coastal   appropriate to evaluate results of studies that have been
            zones  throughout  history.  For  example,  increased  de-  carried out using different methods on a local scale.
            struction of natural vegetation cover, and particularly of   The  deltas  of  rivers  such  as  the  Büyük  Menderes
            forests related to requirements for wood fuel and driven   River and the Küçük Menderes that occupy large tec-
            by increasing population, as well as the enhanced wel-  tonic depressions have reached deeper open sea where
            fare of that population, have always been highlighted as   they  are  at  the  scale  of  mountainous  areas  (Fig. 1).
            important factors in erosion .                    Consequently,  they  will  advance  much  more  slowly
                                   23
              On the other hand, as delta plains advancing to sea   from now on. As a different example, in the north the
            level have been covered with flood alluvium over time,   advance of the Karamenderes Delta in front of Troy
            the ancient settlements behind the shores have remained   ended when it reached the Çanakkale Strait (Darda-
            under the present sea level. For example, the foundation   nelles), because the strait current swept the advancing
            of the Artemis temple in Ephesus and the architectural   alluvial  deposits  into  the Aegean  Sea.  Furthermore,
            remains from the Hellenistic-Roman periods behind it,   large dams that have been constructed for several rea-
            which were built on the shore of the sea that encroached   sons at present contain the water and alluviums from
            upon the Selçuk plain, are 5 m deeper than today’s sur-  the upstream basins, substantially reducing the amount
            face at the present sea level (Fig. 3) . The same is valid   reaching the shore. Therefore, the advance of the del-
                                          24
            for the Limantepe-Klazomenai remains in Urla (Figs. 5   ta has been substantially slowed down, and the delta
            and 7). On the northern skirt of Troy, situated on the   shores have even begun an erosion rather than a depo-
            edge of a 30 m high plateau ridge in the northern Aege-  sition process. One of the most striking examples is
            an, there are remains on the coastal plain from this peri-  the Altınova coast in the delta of the Madra River .
                                                                                                         28

             22  KRAFT et al 2001, MÜLLENHOFF 2005, BRÜCKNER 2019.
             23  STOCK et al 2016.
             24  KRAFT et al 2001.
             25  KAYAN 1996.
             26  MÜLLENHOFF 2005.
             27  ERLAT 2009.
             28  KAYAN-VARDAR 2007.




                                                                                                         33
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40