Page 17 - TINA Dergi Sayi 09
P. 17

TINA


                                                                         Maritime Archaeology Periodical


































             fig. 6: Tatlısu-Çiftlikdüzü kazı alanının havadan görünümü, Kıbrıs. (Fotoğraf: Tatlısu Kazı ve Araştırma Projesi Arşivi).
             fig. 6: An aerial view of Tatlısu-Çiftlikdüzü excavation site, Cyprus. (Photographic Archive of the Excavation and Sur-
             vey Project in Tatlısu).



              Based on the data from the excavations at the Akroti-  on what has been uncovered on the island so far, this
            ri-Aetokremnos rock shelter, it is also likely that the first   period has been referred to as “Cypro-PPNB” by some
            human  presence  on  the  island  extended  from  10,000   investigators, in order to emphasize the intense interac-
            BCE to the period of earlier settlements.  Whether this   tion and connection with the neighbouring mainland.
                                                                                                           19
                                              16
            archaeologically disputable  chronological gap is true or   Therefore, studies on the Early Neolithic period, includ-
                                   17
            not will only be understood after intensive surveys and   ing Tatlısu-Çiftlikdüzü, are of great importance, not only
            excavations to be undertaken in the future.       for Cyprus, but also for Neolithic period in Near East.
              The archaeological discoveries of the past 25 years in-  tAtLISu-ÇIFtLIKDÜZÜ
            dicate that the colonization of the island occurred much   Tatlısu-Çiftlikdüzü,  which lies on the northern coast
                                                                                 20
            earlier than previously believed, and that the chronology   of  Cyprus,  is  dated  to  8,200  BCE,  i.e.  the Aceramic
            of the Neolithic period is both longer and more complex.   Neolithic  period  (or  Cypro-PPNB/MPPNB).   Despite
                                                                                                    21
            The archaeological excavations at the Tatlısu-Çiftlikdüzü   long-term agricultural damage, the site is very well pre-
            (Akanthou-Arkosyko) settlement to the east of Kyrenia,   served. The excavations that have been conducted since
            which followed the excavations at Parekklisha-Shillou-  1999 have yielded six oval and square-planned dwell-
            rokambos in the Limassol region, Kissonerga-Mylouth-  ings  with  stone  foundations,  some  with  painted  mud-
            kia in the Paphos region, and Tenta in the Kalavassos   brick walls. These structures were surrounded by a large
            valley, not only illuminate the earliest period of the is-  ditch running east to west across the southern part of the
            land’s  prehistory,  but  also  provide  insight  into  move-  settlement. Faunal, botanic, and other remains indicate
            ments, communication, and interaction of populations,   that there was heavy consumption of seafood among the
            as well as the Neolithic process in the Eastern Mediter-  residents of Tatlısu, which played a significant role in
            ranean and Near East.  Due to the intense interaction of   their subsistence economy, as well as various types of
                               18
            the earliest settlers on Cyprus with the Near East, based  domestic plants, animal species, and game animals.
            17
            16       PELTENBUrG 2004b; KNAPP 2013; MCCArT-
                     AMMErMAN vd. 2008.
            18       COLLEDGE 2004; PELTENBUrG 2004A; WAT-    20      The site is now under the protection of the Antiques
                                                              19
                                                                      PELTENBUrG 2001; 2003; 2004.
            NEY 2005; GUILLAINE - BrIOIS 2006.
                                                              Law for preservation of monuments.
            KINS 2004.                                        21      ŞEVKETOĞLU -HANSON, 2015.
            16  AMMErMAN et al. 2008.
            17  PELTENBUrG 2004b; KNAPP 2013; MCCArTNEY 2005; GUILLAINE - BrIOIS 2006.
            18  COLLEDGE 2004; PELTENBUrG 2004 a; WATKINS 2004.
            19  PELTENBUrG 2001; 2003; 2004.
            20  The site is now under the protection of the Antiques Law for preservation of monuments.
            21  ŞEVKETOĞLU -HANSON, 2015.
                                                                                                         15
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22